Since the establishment of the interim government in Bangladesh following the resignation of Sheikh Hasina in August 2024, one of the most pressing issues has been the continued tenure of Army Chief General Wakar-Uz-Zaman. Despite growing public demand and international pressure for his removal, the interim administration has yet to take decisive action. This delay raises several questions about the political, institutional, and security factors influencing the government’s decision-making process.
Political Considerations
The interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has pledged to restore democratic governance and uphold human rights. However, removing General Wakar-Uz-Zaman prematurely could trigger instability within the military, which remains a powerful institution in Bangladesh’s political landscape. Given that the military played a critical role in facilitating the transition from Hasina’s administration, Yunus and his team must tread carefully to avoid alienating key factions within the armed forces.
Institutional Resistance and Military Influence
The Bangladeshi military has historically exerted considerable influence over civilian governments. Removing an army chief is not a simple administrative action; it requires navigating a complex web of institutional protocols and power dynamics. General Wakar-Uz-Zaman still commands loyalty among senior officers, and his abrupt dismissal could lead to internal rifts or even resistance from segments of the military.
Security and Stability Concerns
The country remains in a fragile state following the violent upheaval of mid-2024. The interim government is prioritizing stability, and a sudden leadership change within the military could exacerbate existing tensions. If Wakar-Uz-Zaman perceives his removal as a threat, there is a possibility of backlash, including military defiance or even a coup attempt. As a result, the interim administration is likely exploring a more gradual approach to transitioning military leadership.
International and Diplomatic Factors
International actors, including the United Nations and regional powers, are closely monitoring Bangladesh’s political transition. While some nations advocate for military accountability and democratic reforms, others prefer a pragmatic approach that prioritizes stability over swift institutional purges. The interim government may be delaying Wakar-Uz-Zaman’s removal to align with diplomatic strategies that prevent unnecessary geopolitical complications.
Possible Scenarios for His Removal
- Gradual Transition – The interim government might be negotiating with military leadership to arrange a smooth handover, allowing Wakar-Uz-Zaman to step down voluntarily.
- Post-Election Removal – If early elections are held as promised, the new civilian government may take responsibility for appointing a new army chief.
- International Mediation – Diplomatic pressure from international bodies could play a role in facilitating a structured transition without abrupt disruptions.
While many expected General Wakar-Uz-Zaman’s removal shortly after the interim government’s formation, the delay reflects the complexities of Bangladesh’s political and military landscape. Balancing the need for accountability with the imperative for stability is a delicate task. The coming months will determine whether the interim government can navigate these challenges successfully while maintaining its legitimacy and fulfilling its promise of democratic restoration.